Politicians in Cages

 
One thing they're not discussing at the Conservative conference is why they didn't used to have a ring of steel for their conferences - that is, where did they go wrong!

The reason they're not discussing it is that they feel perfectly at home in cages.

Cages is where they belong.

Together with the journalists acting as their unpaid PR rather than asking real questions.
 

Mr Spock's Prescription for Earth

  
With so many half humans around, who does Mr Spock think should run the country?

Unfortunately, Mr Spock hasn't been born yet, but an intergalactic psychic has published the following premises and conclusion, given in a trance conversation with the future Mr Spock:

PREMISES

1. Humans and Vulcans both need established principles of government.

2. It's a well established principle on Earth that minorities are the most important people and so should rule the majority.  It's called Democracy.

3. Sexual minorities are the most important minorities as seedy sex is the most attractive thing for most of the opinion formers.

4. The most responsible minority should rule.

5. Shoe sniffers are a sexual minority who are discreet and respect non shoe sniffers - they don't  tell everyone what they get up to and expect everyone to say how sweet or else call them shoephobic.

6. Currently 'gays' rule. They're the most wacko of sexual minorities, engaging in faecal sex and unremitting megalomania, demanding that everyone should consider this as normal behaviour, just like marching down the streets chanting how proud they are of their bottoms, launching the WMD AIDS, followed by even more exhibitionism, followed by name calling against anyone unimpressed with them is perfectly normal behaviour. The female gays constitute the cunnilingus and dildo cocky know it all sexual minority - all claiming that they come from a Greek island and really pissing off the locals there, not caring of course.

CONCLUSION

Shoe sniffers are more socially responsible than gays so the Earth should be run by shoe sniffers.

1984 - Happy Ending version
  

   

The Psychology of David "little runt" Cameron

"No evil conqueror in history ever dismantled the marriages of the conquered"

I don't subscribe to the theory that Cameron is a closet paedophile or one of the up and coming bestials who sees the dismantling of marriage as the first step to the salvation of all forms of immorality.

A second theory, comparing early facial expressions of Hitler and Cameron on film, is that they are both drinking from the same dark energy.  Cameron certainly has no real interest in the lost souls whose social salvation he claims to seek.  Also, the Conservative Party and government could be just tools to him - like they are to his sexual nazi leaders - breaking them doesn't matter as long as the job is done. Tools to achieve that godlike prominence in human history.  The glory of transforming human history.  Transforming mankind. To be a God.

A third theory is that he is just doing it for intoxicating twisted kicks.


Of course, there is always a fourth possibility that Cameron is telling the truth when he says that he believes that it is reactionary for anyone in the Conservative Party to be unimpressed with sodomy  (the gateway through which AIDS arrived into the world), sexual confusion, licentiousness, genital mutilation, and contempt of Christianity and human language, not to mention being unimpressed with formal objections from the people of Lesbos.


A fifth possibility, and probably nearer the mark, is that as Cameron just wanted to be Prime Minister - his only real goal for the country - and that given that fanatical sodomites/wackos are in control of the real power, after organised infiltration of government over many years, Cameron is just doing what he's told to do (I'm sure they tell him politely) as the easiest way of feeling important.

Whatever the case, the soul of David Cameron is certainly one of those that the devil has full title to.

1984 - Happy Ending version
   

Pigs, Pervs and Paedos Pillage and Rape People's Marriages

  
"No conqueror in history has sodomised the marriages of the conquered"

Most of the so called Lords voted to allow the 'Bill' to automatically abolish the marriage people are in, and then automatically thrust them into an institution with rectum abuse, ex post facto at its legal centre, to proceed.  

An institution also founded on unnatural practices, sexual disorientation, genital mutilation, and psychotic hatred of words like 'marriage', 'wife', 'husband' in all languages - that is, a psychotic hatred of human beings characteristic of demons (*).

To add insult to injury in true de Sade style, the new depraved institution, is to be given the same name - 'marriage'.

Even the Rocky Horror Show never dreamt of such exquisite perversions and torturous rape.

What is certain, is that even the original Nazis were more easily identified as human beings than most of those in so called parliament.

What is equally certain is that such large scale breach of human rights - State sexual bullying/sadism - renders Britain as legitimate a State under the original UN Declaration as Nazi Germany.

The similarity between the Nazis misusing German Law to implement deviant race theories, and today's sexual nazis misusing Western Law to implement deviant sex theories, is quite striking.

First we had basic human rights of orphans abolished under New Labour, with the support of David Cameron, the most ignominious and despised Conservative leader ever, who likes to drink to the full the cup of being important, and treat orphans with about as much respect as inanimate dolls.  

And now we have the abolition of real marriage in a rogue homosexual Police State!   

A land where sickos genuinely believe that Parliament can do whatever it likes, despite the lessons of WWII and commitments to human rights. 

A land where sickos believe that Parliament can pass 'laws' giving the Droit du Seigneur to Parliamentarians and declare homosexuals 'married'.

As for the word 'marriage' and its clear English meaning, the satanic sodomites are once again at work destroying language. 

Just as the word 'gay' developed a colloquial meaning of 'loose woman' or 'licentious', the colloquialism being then used by big mouth homosexuals who thought it amusing to call themselves 'gay' in that colloquial sense - leading to now one being unable to use the word 'gay' in its proper sense - the word 'marriage' is soon to become something arrogantly odious, like the word 'gay' became.

The Politics of Abuse, where normal heterosexuality is called 'homophobia', has now developed into the Politics of  Sadism. 

This was planned for years by networked criminally insane sodomites, making former Freemasonry seem like a children's party. Certainly the freemasonry of sodomy (ie sexual perversion) in the Police Force, Home Office, and so called Ministry of Justice, is stronger than the funny handshake kind ever was.   
    
(*)  The prevalence of the word 'hatred' within the Establishment is a mirroring of the hatred the new nazis in control have of normality, Britain, and ordinary people.  At least the original Nazis didn't come up with the word 'Naziphobic' to use against Jews.
   

1984 - Happy Ending version

  

    

Pride in Evil

"Whores and rogues of their honour often speak"

                   Old English Proverb

Islamic terrorism and AIDS are amongst the greatest problems of the age.

Everyone knows that the former is a result of unadulterated Koranic incitement to hatred and killing affecting the disaffected.

Everyone knows that the latter was a result of mass rectum abuse and gross sexual practices, particularly in the States and Africa.

Adding insult to injury we have the absurd terms 'islamaphobia' and 'homophobia'.

These terms can only be seen by the normal person as an expression of pride in evil.
 

Welsh vs English Police "Sheep Shaggers"

    
Being drunk and calling policemen in Wales  "sheep-shaggers" is racially aggravated disorderly conduct.

Being drunk and calling policemen in England  "sheep-shaggers" is just disorderly conduct.

Luckily for me I'm an honorary Welshman (according to some locals where I hide myself away at times!).

I will certainly be claiming any insult against me constitutes a racial hate incident.

Now Englishmen could never get away with that.

Jack Straw, of East European descent (they're called sleepers), explained: "the English are potentially very aggressive, very violent" - obviously they're second class citizens, deserving of the finest insults.  

In Beelzebub's 'Rocky Horror Show' Britain, the English, like the normal heterosexual, are personae non gratae.  This is the first article of Beelzebub's Creed developed by Jack Straw and fellow Beelzebubians.

Beelzebubian Human Rights are nobly aimed at foreigners and homosexuals being able to insult, or take the P out of, the English and heterosexuals as much as they like - any retaliatory insults constituting hate incidents by racists and homophobes. 

Never let it be said that Beelzebub doesn't look after his own....
      

RESOLVING THE MARRIAGE CRISIS

Currently those who marry in Church have two marriage certificates.

One from the Church and one from the Registrar's Office.

This practice will have to be changed if the Bill to use the word 'marriage' in two different ways is passed.

It would be macabre to expect those who marry in Church making vows to be part of one institution to be then required to sign that they agree to be part of another institution completely at odds with the one they had just made vows to join!

ONE MARRIAGE, ONE CERTIFICATE

Similarly it would be sexual sadism if existing married couples are automatically forced against their will to be part of an institution where sodomy plays an integral part.

If the bill is passed they should be allowed to return their certificates if they wish.

I am sure that all those who avidly use the word 'fair' will welcome such a proposal and for such an amendment.

Indeed, even if the bill is not passed, it would still be sexual sadism now to require people married in Church to have two marriage certificates, following the government's claim that rectum abuse should be an integral element of the legal meaning of the consummation of civil 'marriage'.

Also having ONLY one certificate is the ONLY way of showing exactly which institution a couple has agreed to - whether holy matrimony or satanic marriage (eg those ordained by The Church of Satan, Homosexual Cults posing as Christians, The Church of Jimmy Savile and the Music Industry, the Registrar's Office, or any held at the BBC, Downing Street, Whitehall or Parliament buildings).
   
As for what should really happen, the sexual bully boys and girls all need to be tried and sentenced in an international court, whether they led 'government' or 'charity' or hacking attempts on this site.  A court with the power to imprison or have kept in secure mental establishments!
 
 

The Monarch and the, um, Coronation Oath

"So should I give consent to flatter sin?"
                                              Henry VI Part 1

"So should I give consent to flatter sin?  Well I have so far."
                                                                                      Elizabeth II
 

So instead of providing counselling to men suffering from acute emotional dysphoria leading to the development of self identity as nothing more than anal fetish (such mental patients have repeatedly claimed "I am the act"), Beelzebub has instructed the minds of those he controls in his Satanic Temple (aka Parliament) to write the Book of the Travesty of Marriage.

If it gets through the Lords the Queen will no doubt rubber stamp it as she has other verses from the Dark Bible (aka Statutes).

The Queen, however, knows right from wrong.  She knows the meaning of words she uttered in the Coronation Oath.

She knows that "God"  means neither Ministers nor Parliament.
    

The Politician in Charge

"If God does nothing about Parliament He owes a written apology to Sodom and Gomorrah"

                                                                          

With an unconstitutional fixed 5 year Parliamentary term - allowing no dissent - we are, constitutionally, in a dictatorship.

Not a benevolent one.

Although selling his soul for five years of being treated as important, David Cameron still has to follow the policies of the Dark Lord Beelzebub (although in truth, Beelzebub's power seems to have shrunk quite a lot, if in order to assert earthly authority, he needs his acolytes to engage in mass sexual bullying and name calling of anyone who throws up at the sight of two men kissing, including the orphans given to them in 'adoption' ).

Moderates - particularly moderate MPs and moderate homosexuals - are all considered traitors in the sexual dictatorship, but can console themselves that treason has more or less been abolished as a crime.  Normal heterosexuals in the real world are not, of course, considered at all.

Shakespeare, whether or not he was indeed 'greedy', certainly has things to say about all this. 


"Thou art sick in the world's regard, wretched and low, a poor unminded outlaw sneaking home!"
                                                                                                           -Henry V

"Such is thy audacious wickedness, thy lewd pestiferous and dissentious pranks, as very infants prattle of thy pride"
                                                                                                -Henry VI, Part 1

"Pernicious blood sucker of sleeping men."
                                                  -Henry VI, Part 2

"I think he be transformed into a beast, for I can no where find him like a man."
                                                                                               -As You Like It

"From the extremest upward of thy head to the descent and dust beneath thy foot, a most toad spotted traitor."
                                                            -King Lear

"His humour is lofty, his discourse peremptory, his tongue filed, his eye ambitious, his gait majestical, and his general behaviour vain, ridiculous, and thrasonical.  He is too picked, too spruce, too affected, too odd, as it were, too peregrinate, as I may call it."
                                                          - Love's Labour's Lost
    

"You are not worth another word"
                                             -Twelfth Night
  
  
    

SKYFALL - The Moral of the Teenage Q

 
Skyfall brought in more money than any other Bond film.

It also had the daftest plot.

There's a moral here for all entrepreneurs!

First the teenage Q played the big shot - "I can do more damage in my pyjamas before breakfast on my laptop than you can do in a year in the field.".

Well, actually he was right.

He went on to brag about how he wrote the security which only a handful of people knew about, including the villain.

Then, he cleverly switched on the villain's laptop using the security he wrote -  which promptly released the imprisoned villain to blow a hole in London's underground, and shooting any number of people before shooting out a public enquiry.

Not wishing to be outdone by the teenager, Bond then cleverly set a trap for the villain - "one step ahead"  he said.

The trap involved using M as bait, to lure the villain and his small army with heavy firepower to a remote house, where Bond and an old gamekeeper would take them on with a couple of shotguns.

Surprise, surprise, this got M killed.

At least the film had a silver lining - it got rid of  Judi Dench who just stood there terrified in the chapel even when the villain gave her his gun to shoot him...